After analyzing them individually, and seeing how they behave in video recording and in performances with Antutu Benchmark, today we examine in our comparison Meizu MX6 vs Ments Apollo Lite, two devices belonging to the medium-high band of the Chinese market.

Innovative different, materials similar and one hardware almost identical. Which one will win the winner? Discover it with us in this interesting comparison between MX6 ed Apollo Lite!

Discover more:
Meizu MX6, the review of GizChina
Ments Apollo Lite, the review of GizChina

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite, the comparison of GizChina

Design, Display and Construction Quality

Looking back at them both devices highlight the shell realized metal. The stripes' shielding system is more elegant MX6, with two thin white lines, compared to the two upper and lower polycarbonate inserts of Apollo Lite.

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite

A particular note deserves the coloration of the device of ments, really pleasing to the eye, extremely elegance and more particular than the classic colors proposed by the various manufacturers.

Both devices are equipped with a 5.5 Full HD Thumbs which are however different from each other. Despite the panel manufacturer is Sharp for both devices, that of MX6 presents a multi-touch a 10 points against i 5 dell 'Apollo Lite.

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite

Furthermore, the display of the home device Meizu results brighter and with brighter colors. Equal pixel density (PPI 401), and present on both smartphones a menu within the settings for change la chromatic calibration.

Better theoleofobicità as well as the reflectivity of the glass to protect the per Meizu MX6. Despite this, on both devices, protective glass Gorilla Glass 3 provides a pleasant rounding on the edges 2.5D. Good viewing angles on both devices.

Although the blacks are not particularly deep, they are panels IPS LCD, the same turn out good, but better on MX6, while we have not encountered any problems either on MX6 that of Apollo Lite regarding the color change at the increase in the viewing angle.

On top of the display, on all 2 devices we find the headset, i sensors di brightness e proximity, the front camera and a comfortable one Notification LED.

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite

La front camera both on the home device Meizu how much on that of ments adopts a sensor from 5 mega-pixels.

Below, however, the solutions adopted by the manufacturers vary between the 2 models. On Ments Apollo Lite the band under the display appears to be empty, since i keys are on the screen.

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite

Sul Meizu MX6 is present key mBack with integrated fingerprint recognition function with technology mTouch 2.1. Vice versa, in Ments Apollo Lite il sensor for unlocking with fingerprint is positioned later poco under the main camera.

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite

Sul right edge di Meizu e ments we find the power button and the rocker for volume adjustment.

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite

On the left edge, MX6 presents only one slot to accommodate the two Nano SIMswithout the possibility of expanding the internal memory da 32 GB.

Still on the left profile, Ments Apollo Lite Incorporates two slots, one to hold one Microphone SIMs. and a second hybrid, able to accommodate one nano SIM or memory expansion via microSD to 128 GB.

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite

Even the lower edges have differences: in Meizu MX6 we find the door centrally USB Type-C, main microphone, system speaker and mini jack input. In Ments Apollo Liteinstead, we find the same equipment except for the mini jack input.

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite

Finally, the edge lower it houses the entrance mini jack for the home device ments and according to microphone for the suppression of environmental noises in MX6 (not present on Apollo Lite).

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite

On the back of the central camera we find the sensors of the main camera: 16 mega-pixels per Apollo Lite e 12 mega-pixels su MX6 with matching on both dual LED flash terminals dual tone.

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite

Hardware and Performance

As anticipated, on board the two devices we find a I share hardware definitely similar. The heart that drives smartphones is indeed the processor MediaTek Helio X20 MT6797, deca-core operating at a clock of 2.3 GHz. The GPU it is instead the Mali-T880 MP4 operating at the frequency of 700 MHz.

Also under the profile of RAM the endowment is of the first level, being present well 4 GB of type L.

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite

Nell 'daily use there are no noteworthy differences: the fluidity of system is always eccellente and both devices are without lag o jamming.

Lato Gaming, despite the Mali-T880 does not reach the performance of the Adreno 530, the Meizu MX6 offers a 'excellent la gameplay. His rival Apollo Liteinstead, it emphasizes cali di frame rate, lag and setbacks, all of which are certainly attributable to poor optimization of on-board software.

Promoted la web browsing on both terminals.

Photographic sector

Below, the complete specifications regarding the photographic compartments of the 2 devices:

  • Meizu MX6
    • 12 mpx Sony IMX386 Exmor RS - f / 2.0 - autofocus PDAF - dual LED dual tone
    • 5 mpx  f / 2.0
  • Ments Apollo Lite
    • 16 mpx Samsung Isocell S5K3P3 - f / 2.0 - dual LED dual tone
    • 5 mpx Samsung S5K5E8

The quality of the returned shots is completely comparable. Enough good la management of the shine and shadows and to the shots at night.

  • Meizu MX6
  • Ments Apollo Lite

1080P Video Test

Audio quality

Both devices, as we have noted, present thespeaker of system placed in the lower edge.

As for the audio of theMX6 è high and with one good quality overall, better than the device of ments, More bass in the volume reachable and with one lower quality.

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite

Both smartphones have equalizers to improve listening to headphones. Present on Ments Apollo Lite the implementation of the digital audio in lossless quality through the entrance USB Type-C (even if no USB Type-C / mini jack adapter is included in the package).


La reception of the 2 is good, even if that of Meizu MX6 turned out slightly top. In addition, the dialing of the call and its connection to the network for the Meizu home device is faster.

MX6 vs Apollo Lite

Despite this, the speed di change of cell è good on both devices, as well as the signal, whose stability is always good. Quick also passage da 3G / 4G to the network Wi-Fi that has never created problems. We remember the presence area of 20 band da 800 MHz on Apollo Lite unlike MX6 which is not provided.

Connectivity Wi-Fi presents full band support 802.11 a / b / g / n. The two terminals are veloci to surf and have one good reception.

Even in satellite navigation, the two performed very well, being gifted with GPS / A-GPS / GLONASS / Beidou.


The software, on both devices, is based on Android 6.0 Marshmallow. In the case of Meizu MX6 the excellent proprietary interface is present Flyme 5. In Ments Apollo Liteinstead, we find substantially one ROM stock, not personalized by the manufacturer.

Meizu MX6

Substantial differences, In which Meizu MX6 they lead to one greater pleasantness of use, especially with reference to always useful and functional gestures that make theone-handed use particularly simple even in devices with a wide screen diagonal.

Ments Apollo Lite


  • Meizu MX6: 3060 mAh
  • ments Apollo Lite: 3180 mAh

THEautonomy, considering the capacity of the batteries, it's good both on Meizu how much on the ments. With standard use, the day is covered without any problems, with an average of active screen variable between the 4 / 5 hours, based on personal use.

I charging times they are good, thanks to the respective technology Pump Express 3.0 ed mCharge, with about 1 now and a half hours to get one full recharge.

Meizu MX6 vs Vernee Apollo Lite, the comparison of


As you may have noticed, we are talking about two excellent devices all in all. Meizu MX6 has an extra gear, compared to Ments Apollo Lite, although we must consider a difference in the purchase price of both devices that is in favor of the home device ments.

And what do you think? Let us know in your comments which device you would choose and why.